영어 자작 문항 (난이도 下)
33. 다음 빈칸에 들어갈 내용으로 가장 적절한 것은? [3점]
The one-way-ness of proof of what you've undergone - as the aspect of credibility - is emerged while you experience the absurd investigation of agencies you meet. Imagine you've ridden a taxi without any black boxes or even a camera, and you suddenly got into a car accident intended by a habitual aggressive driver. You will feel irrational while the investigation is under process. The rude driver seems to merely apologize to the investigation agency and insurance company rather than prove his innocence and consult with you and your companions. Smelling fishy, you take your signature on the agreement paper. Unfortunately, the stratagem of the driver is well recognized, and we say you failed to overcome the inherent passiveness of the defendant. As I said before, the engraved shrink of self-esteem is natural, especially when you are in a real-life application like a car accident. However, I do not guarantee that parties tolerate your passive voice unless you prove the certain intent of the aggressive driver without any flow. The circumstance of suing and persuading maybe is seemed as harsh, especially for an unprofessional member like you. Yet ________________________, do not fall in the gain-and-gain logic plaintiffs claim. Winning in the fluency bites you an overall triumph of the sue, and an active attitude of outfacing the erratum you watch is commonly demanded. If the atmosphere flows in the forward direction, then there is even a chance to bring up the inflexible 'crime' or 'fault' they made, and don't forget hardly 5 % of the total defendants reach the stage of counterattack.
① follow the pre-existing successful speech logic of lawyers who had spoken
② think about the numerous cases defendants had won in the past with the appeal based on the verified facts
③ make sure not to spoil the originality of the speaking datum your legal team wrote for you
④ expect the counter-effects that occur with their clumsy and negatively-listening word choices
⑤ do not give appeals to judges which are too biased in exerting your current emotional conditions
0 XDK (+0)
유익한 글을 읽었다면 작성자에게 XDK를 선물하세요.
-
이러면 약사와 다른 게 뭘까요? 출처:...
2번..? 개어렵네영
지문 퀄리티는 어느정도되는것같나요
전반적으로 괜찮은 것 같은데 너무 예시 분량이 많네요.. 일반화된 문장이 좀 더 있었으면 좋을 것 같아용
수능에 나오면 나름 킬러일것같은데..ㄷㄷ
이렇게 passive한 글을 가져다가 수능에 낼거같지는 않긴해요 ㅋㅋ
one-way-ness나 gain-and-gain처럼 하이픈으로 연결된 거 뭔 뜻이죠?
아 복잡하다